CedarCopilot wants to merge 0 commits into staging from docs/ambiguity-pinged-at-outage-writeup
Live on prod, no production signal yet
Libra has no production signal for this change on prod yet. Libra checks hourly for 3 days after each deploy.
crm_meeting_events.ambiguity_pinged_at was added to the Drizzle schema (commit a87e2865e) without the corresponding migration ever being applied to prod, silently failing every meeting-ingestion attempt org-wide for ~23 hours.updateExecutionStep unconditionally writes status: 'completed' regardless of whether the run actually succeeded, which is why nobody was paged and why the true blast radius (91 executions / 84+ meetings / 30+ users) was undercounted on the first pass.replay-execution.ts, a background batch that survived TaskStop, a CloudWatch search window that wasn't re-derived from the actual fix time).SHERLOCK_SYSTEM_KNOWLEDGE.md so a future related investigation finds it via the sherlock skill.5cf965ab-e9d1-4af9-b41c-d9d7dd07d020).🤖 Generated with Claude Code
The docs-only PR is safe to merge from a runtime perspective, but the incident record should be corrected to avoid misleading future responders.
### Issue 1
apps/server/docs/bug-reports/ambiguity-pinged-at-meeting-ingestion-outage.md:34
The report says no migration file exists, but this PR’s head contains `apps/server/src/db/migrations/add_ambiguity_pinged_at_to_crm_meeting_events.sql` with the documented `ALTER TABLE`. The file remains outside the Drizzle journal and requires manual application. Please distinguish “the migration exists but is not applied automatically” from “no migration was created” so responders understand both the current repository state and the remaining drift risk. The same inaccurate claim appears in the evidence table at line 93.
### Issue 2
apps/server/docs/bug-reports/ambiguity-pinged-at-meeting-ingestion-outage.md:63-64
The write-up says the webhook checks the final step’s `success` field, but `handleExecuteMeeting` actually checks Mastra’s `workflowResult.status`. Because the upstream failures are returned instead of thrown, the workflow status remains successful and the route returns HTTP 200. Documenting the wrong signal directs future debugging toward the final payload rather than the non-throwing workflow boundary. The new Sherlock entry repeats the same inaccurate explanation.
### Issue 3
apps/server/docs/bug-reports/ambigu
Libra has not measured any production surfaces for this change yet.